Access key links:

This site uses cookies to help make it more useful and reliable. Our cookies page explains what they are, which ones we use, and how you can manage or remove them.

Construction joint venture threatens competition

21 Feb 2012


The Competition Commission (CC) has decided provisionally that the proposed UK joint venture between Anglo American PLC (Anglo American) and Lafarge S.A. (Lafarge) could damage competition in certain markets for construction materials.


Anglo American, through its UK subsidiary Tarmac Limited (Tarmac), and Lafarge are both global firms that are active in the supply of construction materials in the UK. The parties propose to establish a 50:50 joint venture, to which each of them would contribute the bulk of their construction materials businesses in the UK.

The two parties’ main overlapping activities in relation to the joint venture are in the production and supply of cement, aggregates, asphalt and ready mix concrete (RMX). Cement and aggregates are the key ingredients of RMX. As well as being used in the construction of roads and buildings, aggregates can be used in the production of asphalt and in specialist applications such as rail ballast and high purity limestone used for its chemical properties.

In a summary of its provisional findings report published today, the CC has concluded that the joint venture could lead to a substantial lessening of competition (SLC) in the markets for:

  • the supply of bulk cement;
  • the supply of rail ballast;
  • the supply of high purity limestone, when used for flue gas desulphurization (the abatement of acid gas emissions from coal-fired power stations);
  • the supply of primary aggregates for construction applications in 23 local markets;
  • the supply of asphalt in two local markets; and
  • the supply of RMX in seven local markets.

Chairman of the Anglo/Lafarge Inquiry Group, Roger Witcomb, said:

'We have a number of concerns about this joint venture.

'In bulk cement there are currently only four UK producers, and there is evidence that the market is not as competitive as it could be. Prices and profit margins haven’t been affected in the way we would have expected following the big falls in the demand for cement in the past few years. We have not reached a view on whether or not there has been coordination in the bulk cement market. But we are concerned that the proposed tie-up would increase the susceptibility of this market to coordination. Some of the reasons for this arise from the proposed combination of the cement businesses and some from the increased vertical integration that would result from the combination of their RMX businesses. Lafarge currently has a relatively small RMX business, while Tarmac has a relatively large one.

'The tie-up could also reduce competition for two specific aggregates products—rail ballast and high purity limestone used for flue gas desulphurization—because of the shortage of alternative suppliers.

'This is a particularly complex investigation because of the number of different products, the varying degrees of substitutability between them, and the fact that cement is an input into RMX and aggregates are an input into both RMX and asphalt. In addition, for aggregates used in general construction applications markets are quite localized as a result of high transport costs compared with product value. The markets for asphalt and RMX are also localized, but for them the issue is perishability. We have therefore had to examine competitive conditions in a large number of local markets for these products in coming to our view on the likely effect of the proposed joint venture on competition.

'We are now consulting on the possible actions we could take in response to the reductions in competition we have found, bearing in mind the close links that exist between the different product markets.'

As well as the summary of provisional findings, the CC has published a notice of possible remedies, outlining ways that the potential anti-competitive effects of the joint venture could be prevented. The full provisional findings report will be published shortly.

Comments on the provisional findings and the notice of possible remedies are invited in writing by 13 March 2012 and 6 March 2012 respectively. To submit evidence, please email anglolafarge@cc.gsi.gov.uk or write to:

David du Parc Braham
Inquiry Manager (Anglo/Lafarge)
Competition Commission
Victoria House
Southampton Row
LONDON
WC1B 4AD

Notes for editors

1. The CC is an independent public body, which carries out investigations into mergers, markets and the regulated industries.

2. The members of the Anglo American/Lafarge Inquiry Group are:
Roger Witcomb (CC Chairman and Group Chairman), Alexander JohnstonIan Jones and Richard Taylor.

3. The OFT referred the case to the CC on 2 September 2012. The normal 24-week period case has been extended twice and the CC must now publish its final report by 1 May 2012.

4. The Enterprise Act 2002 empowers the OFT to refer to the CC completed or proposed mergers for investigation and report which create or enhance a 25 per cent share of supply in the UK (or a substantial part thereof) or where the UK turnover associated with the enterprise being acquired is over £70 million.

5. Further information on this inquiry, including the terms of reference and other key documents is available at:

www.competition-commission.org.uk/our-work/anglo-american-lafarge

6. Enquiries should be directed to Rory Taylor or Siobhan Allen or by ringing 020 7271 0242.