Argus Press Ltd and Trinity International Holdings
plc: A report on the proposed transfers
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
On 6 August 1993 we were asked to investigate and report on the proposed
transfers to Trinity International Holdings plc (Trinity) of the newpapers
published by Argus Newspapers Ltd (Argus Newspapers), a subsidiary of
Argus Press Ltd (Argus) (see Appendix 1.1).
Argus Newspapers publishes some 50 paid-for and free weekly newspapers
in south-east England across an area from Swindon to South London. Trinity
publishes newspapers in England, Wales, Scotland and North America.
Argus was formed in September 1988 following a management buy-out from
BET plc. Cash constraints have prevented Argus from introducing direct
input technology and have led to the decision to dispose of Argus Newspapers.
We consider the public interest issues arising from the proposed transfers
under three headings: accurate presentation of news and free expression
of opinion; concentration of ownership and competition for readers and
advertisers; and employment and employment-related matters.
The accurate presentation of news and free expression of opinion has
been considered in two recent MMC inquiries involving Trinity. Trinity
agrees broad editorial and advertising policies with the management of
its newspapers, based on the perceived requirements of readers and advertisers
in the communities where the newspapers are published. Its newspapers
do not follow a common editorial line. We see no reason to believe that
Trinity will change its exisiting policy in respect of editorial independence
after the proposed transfers.
At national level the proposed transfers would increase Trinity's share
of regional and local newspapers from 3.5 to 4.9 per cent, improving its
ranking from eighth to sixth. The proposed acquisition by Trinity of the
local newspapers of Joseph Woodhead & Sons Limited would increase
Trinity's share to 5.3 per cent, leaving its ranking unchanged. At regional
and local level there is no overlap between the geographic areas in which
the Trinity and Argus newspapers are circulated/distributed, nor are they
contiguous. We conclude that the proposed transfers would have no adverse
effect on competition for readers or advertisers.
On the question of employment, Argus remains one of the few significant
newspaper publishers which has yet to take advantage of the efficiency
gains available from introducing direct input technology. We conclude
that job losses at Argus Newspapers are inevitable, regardless of the
proposed transfers.
We conclude that the proposed transfers may be expected not to operate
against the public interest.
Full text
Contents
|
| Chapter
1 |
Summary |
| Chapter
2 |
Background to the proposed transfers |
| Chapter
3 |
Local and regional newspapers in the UK |
| Chapter
4 |
Views of other parties |
| Chapter
5 |
Views of Argus and Trinity |
| Chapter
6 |
Conclusions |
| |
List of signatories |
Appendices
|
|
| (The numbering of the appendices indicates
the chapters to which they relate) |
| 1.1 |
The reference and background |
| 2.1 |
Trinity: profit and loss accounts |
| 2.2 |
Trinity: balance sheets |
| 2.3 |
Argus Newspapers publishing companies: profit and loss
accounts |
| 2.4 |
Argus Newspapers Division: turnover and trading profit/(loss) |
| 2.5 |
Argus Newspapers Division: capital employed and net assets |
| 3.1 |
Newspapers published by Trinity in the UK: audited circulation
or verified distribution figures per issue, July to December,
1988 to 1992 |
| 3.2 |
Newspapers published in the UK by Argus Newspapers: audited
circulation or verified distribution figures per issue |
Back to the top
|