Trinty International Holdings plc and Joseph Woodhead
& Sons Limited: A report on the proposed transfers of controlling
interests as defined by section 57(4) of the Fair Trading Act 1973
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
On 13 August 1993 we were asked to investigate and report on the proposed
transfers to Trinity International Holdings plc (Trinity) of the newspapers
published by Joseph Woodhead & Sons Limited (Woodhead) and set out
in Appendix 1.1. Trinity publishes newspapers in England, Wales, Scotland
and North America. The proposed transfers would be implemented by the
purchase of the entire share capital of Woodhead, a privately-owned Huddersfield-based
company which publishes newspapers in West Yorkshire.
We consider the public interest issues arising from the proposed transfers
under three headings: accurate presentation of news and free expression
of opinion; concentration of ownership and competition for readers and
advertisers; and employment and employment-related matters.
The accurate presentation of news and free expression of opinion has
been considered in two recent MMC inquiries involving Trinity. Trinity
agrees broad editorial and advertising policies with the management of
its newspapers, based on the perceived requirements of readers and advertisers
in the communities where the newspapers are published. Its newspapers
do not follow a common editorial line. We see no reason to believe that
Trinity will change its existing policy in respect of editorial independence
after the proposed transfers.
At national level the proposed transfers would increase Trinity's share
of regional and local newspapers from 3.5 to 3.9 per cent. The company
would remain the eighth largest UK publisher of regional and local newspapers.
The proposed acquisition by Trinity of the newspapers published by Argus
Press Ltd through its subsidiary Argus Newspapers Ltd, on which we are
reporting separately, would increase its market share to 5.3 per cent,
improving its ranking to sixth. At regional and local level there is no
overlap between the geographic areas in which the Trinity and Woodhead
newspapers are circulated/distributed, nor are they contiguous. We conclude
that the proposed transfers would have no adverse effect on competition
for readers or advertisers.
The proposed transfers would have minimal effects on employment.
We conclude that the proposed transfers may be expected not to operate
against the public interest.
Full text
Contents
|
Chapters
|
|
| Chapter
1 |
Summary |
| Chapter
2 |
Background to the proposed transfers |
| Chapter
3 |
Local and regional newspapers in the UK |
| Chapter
4 |
Views of other parties |
| Chapter
5 |
Views of the main parties |
| Chapter
6 |
Conclusions |
| |
List of signatories |
Appendices
|
|
| (The numbering of the appendices indicates
the chapters to which they relate) |
| 1.1 |
The reference and the background |
| 2.1 |
Trinity: profit and loss accounts |
| 2.2 |
Trinity: balance sheets |
| 2.3 |
HNL: newspaper publishing-profit and loss accounts |
| 2.4 |
HNL: newspaper publishing-capital employed, net assets
and share capital and reserves |
| 3.1 |
Newspapers published by Triniy in the UK: audited circulation
or verified distribution figures per issue, July to December,
1988 to 1992 |
Back to the top
|